<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Increasing Workplace Productivity &#187; multitasking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.increasingworkplaceproductivity.com/tag/multitasking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.increasingworkplaceproductivity.com</link>
	<description>The workplace productivity resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Workplace productivity &#8211; which is better &#8211; one project or multitasking?</title>
		<link>http://www.increasingworkplaceproductivity.com/2009/01/workplace-productivity-is-one-project-or-multitasking-best/</link>
		<comments>http://www.increasingworkplaceproductivity.com/2009/01/workplace-productivity-is-one-project-or-multitasking-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expert speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace productivity tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitasking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.increasingworkplaceproductivity.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all run  around all day doing lots of stuff - some people have methods of prioritising, some people run complext to do lists, others just muddle through.

We were wondering which is best for increasing workplace productivity - is it focusing on one project, or having multiple on the go...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all run around all day doing lots of stuff &#8211; some people have methods of prioritising, some people run complex to do lists, others just muddle through.</p>
<p>We were wondering which is best for increasing <strong>workplace productivity </strong>- is it focusing on one project, or having multiple on the go&#8230; We realise that you don&#8217;t necessarily have a choice in the matter &#8211; but IF you could choose &#8211; which option would be best?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some differing schools of thought.</p>
<p>Some believe focusing all of you time to get a single task done for hours or days ensures the task gets done to the best of your ability. Others would just not be able to focus for so long on one single thing, their mind wanders, and they&#8217;d be much better off focusing on something different for a while and coming back fresh.</p>
<p>Dads always know best don&#8217;t they? The suggestion <a href="http://lifedev.net/2008/12/my-fathers-take-on-getting-stuff-done-3-opened-projects/">here</a> is that one way of keeping busy and entertained is to start three things at the same time&#8230; and switch between the one which best suits your mood. When you&#8217;ve got noone pushing you for deadlines I guess that&#8217;s OK.</p>
<p>These <a href="http://www.lifehack.org/articles/lifehack/how-to-multitask.html">guys</a> provide academic evidence to suggest it&#8217;s not such a good idea and that focus is a much better thing.</p>
<blockquote><p>“When you really study precisely what people’s brains are doing at any moment, there’s less concurrent processing than you might think &#8230; The brain is more of a time-share operation &#8211; when fractions of a second matter, we’re better off not doing another task.”</p>
<p><strong>Hal Pashler, a professor of psychology at the University of California at San Diego.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>So what do you think &#8211; given the choice &#8211; how would you run your day &#8211; focusing on one thing until it was done&#8230; or good old fashioned multasking?!</p>
<p>Leave a comment below.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2009/01/why-multitasking-on-mobile-devices-matters.html">Why Multitasking on Mobile Devices Matters</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5134387/study-claims-women-multitask-tvinternet-twice-as-much-as-men">Study Claims Women Multitask TV/Internet Twice as Much as Men</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/10/24/the-nytimes-backs-me-up-on-multitasking/">The NYTimes Backs Me Up on Multitasking</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_older_you_are_the_better_you_multitask_if_female.php">The Older You Are, the Better You Multi-Task (If You&#8217;re a Woman)</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.duffbert.com/duffbert/blog.nsf/d6plinks/TADF-7MAVST">Book Review &#8211; The Myth of Multitasking: How &#8220;Doing It All&#8221; Gets Nothing Done by Dave Crenshaw</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Image courtesy of <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/soyunterrorista/">kateatyrownrisk</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=ea23a1c7-6916-4b58-8ec8-7adffa93a4a2" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.increasingworkplaceproductivity.com/2009/01/workplace-productivity-is-one-project-or-multitasking-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
